City Passes Tough New Rules on Smoking

Bans smoking inside all multi-unit dwellings, bus stops, theater lines and outdoor dining areas


The city on Monday approved tough new restrictions on where Petaluma residents can smoke, including bus stops, hotels and even people’s own homes, if they live in an apartment, townhouse or condominium.

The changes go into effect August 1, 2013 for new multi-unit dwellings and January 1, 2014 for existing apartment complexes.

It means that residents living next to smokers in any dwelling with shared walls will now have the law on their side when they complain to neighbors or management. If management fails to crack down on smokers, it will give the city’s code enforcement officer recourse to cite the property owner.

Proponents of the ordinance include the local chapter of the American Lung Association and the Petaluma Coalition on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, which have spent years advocating for tougher anti-smoking laws.

“We support it because it will continue to change the social norm and it is our hope that the next generation of youth will not smoke at all,” said Bob Curry, co-chair of the coalition. “We have made significant progress in the last 20 plus years in changing the social norm, with saving lives, improving the health of residents and savings…in healthcare costs.”

Pam Granger, a spokeswoman for the American Lung Association, said the change will result in not only health benefits for residents, but savings for property owners, who have to pay an average of $500 more to clean a unit occupied by a smoker.

“It’s a double whammy, in terms of savings and in public health,” she said.

The council also agreed to make all Petaluma hotels and motels 100 percent smoke-free, although it’s not clear whether hotels would have separate smoking sections.

Councilman Chris Albertson was concerned about the ordinance infringing on smokers’ rights inside their homes, but Granger pointed out that smokers were considered a consumer class and not protected in a similar way that a race or religion is.

“Whenever you have a shared wall, it means an opportunity for smoke to drift in,” she said.

Councilman Mike Healy agreed that steps needed to be taken to eliminate second-hand smoke, which he called a “scourge” but pointed out that ordinance did nothing to protect residents from the danger of second-hand marijuana smoke.

What do you think of the changes? And will you be impacted?

Liz Carrasco December 04, 2012 at 09:14 PM
Thank you. But not everybody who possesses marijuana has a medical reason to use it. I'm not interested in a debate, so I'll just leave it at that.
Pam Granger December 05, 2012 at 02:37 AM
Actually Liz, possession of marijuana for medical reasons may be legal depending on whether one follows California or Federal law, but this updated policy regulates marijuana, medical or not, in every place that tobacco is. In definitions DD - “Smoking” means engaging in an act that generates smoke, including but not limited to lighting or possession of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, or hookah water pipe, an operating e-cigarette or a lighted smoke inhalation device of any king that generates smoke of any kind, from tobacco or any other weed or plant
P A Channel December 05, 2012 at 06:15 AM
Agreed... with regard to the loss of civil liberties. As for the e-cigarette debate, I'd like to see that one challenged in a higher court. Since there is no tobacco, no paper, and therefore nothing to burn, there are no cargenogens - only vapor. About the only complaint a person might have is that they're offended by the very act of what 'appears' to be smoking (but isn't). As for apartment dwellers with children; be it toddlers running in an upstairs unit, or a crying baby that keeps a neighbor up all night, be prepared...
Bradford A Morris December 06, 2012 at 06:18 PM
Thank God - Good Job City memebers for you vote. I still say outlaw smoking anywhere unless it is 50 feet away from any structure or people and or confine smoking to smoke shops that have filteres and catch the smoke and not allow it to become airborn. Let there be smoke shops like gas stations set up all around the city that you have to pay to go into in order to smoke. I would think more people will stop smoking.
Frankie2011 December 18, 2012 at 01:17 PM
Thanks John. You are correct. Thanks!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »