City of Hazelwood Named in Red-Light Camera Lawsuit
Hazelwood is just one a many cities including neighboring Florissant facing class-action lawsuits for the camera system and ticket dispersal process.
The City of Hazelwood has been named in a class-action lawsuit about the use of the red-light cameras.
Ryan Keane and John Campbell of Simon Law Firm filed against Hazelwood on behalf of St. Louis County residents Mark and Juliet Tolman and Dana Hunter, all of whom got red-light tickets in Hazelwood.
The City of Hazelwood and American Traffic Solutions, Inc. (ATS), are accused of "exploiting" the city's ordinance to make money, according to the suit.
The suit also charges the ordinance creates a presumption of guilt, which is unconstitutional. It states the ordinance places the burden of proof on vehicle owners, because the ticket is assigned to the registered owner. The camera is not designed to take images of the faces of occupants of a ticketed motor vehicle.
Keane and Campbell have also filed seperate suits against the cities of Florissant, Creve Coeur, Ellisville, Arnold and Kansas City, MO.
Hazelwood Patch reached out to Hazelwood city attorney Kevin O'Keefe after the Sept. 21 city council meeting, who at the time said he could not comment on the matter.
"I heard that it (the lawsuit) is out there," he said. "I haven't seen it yet."
Following Wednesday's Hazelwood City Council meeting, O'Keefe said the city still had not been served with the suit papers.
Suit drives home several points
Hazelwood City Council approved renewal of its red-light camera contract with MoDOT May 18. That contract is for existing red-light enforcement cameras on state routes within city limits. MoDOT released a study that said the cameras prove effective in reducing accidents at intersections with traffic lights.
Hazelwood has 15 red-light cameras at various intersections, Hazelwood Police Chief Carl Wolf said.
Wolf is named in the lawsuit, and the attorneys argue that ATS also formed two nonprofit organizations that "bill themselves as grassroots citizens' movements" but are really under the control of the red-light vendor.
Wolf heads one of the organizations, Missouri Families for Safer Roads. The suit claims he is the only officer registered to the organization in its 2010 annual registration report.
Wolf has also advocated for the second organization, National Coalition for Safer Roads (NCSR), which promotes the use of red-light cameras in Missouri. Last year, NCSR began running public service announcements in Missouri encouraging public support of the red-light cameras. In September, Fox 2 Now St. Louis reported that the directors listed on NCSR's incorporation paperwork in Missouri are all tied to ATS.
Wolf said he could not comment on the claims in the lawsuit because he has not seen it.
A matter of safety
In previous interviews, Wolf said the red-light cameras help to diminish traffic accidents in some of the busier sections of Hazelwood. He noted that Hazelwood has seen a 58 percent decrease in violations and a 20 percent reduction in accidents at those intersections since the cameras were installed.
“The whole idea is to change the habits of drivers who violate the red lights or who speed and to make the roadways safer,” he said in March, when MoDOT changed the policy requiring municipalities using the cameras to submit a report with the number of citations issued for each camera. “The cameras in Hazelwood have done just that.”
Wolf also said at that time the Hazelwood Police Department devotes many hours to reviewing the videos before issuing the citations.
"It’s all part of the job, just like traditional enforcement," he said.
Dr. Phil
11:25 am on Friday, October 7, 2011
I am not completely opposed to red light cameras. I just got two in hazelwood for making a right on red! This is crap. They said I did not stop behind the white line. You can't see the intersection behind the white line, you have to stop in front of it. IN one you see the light turn green as I make my turn and I still have my 2 $100 tickets to pay! It is nuts! AND where you send the money to and who houses the videos are not even in Missouri!!! I mean if you are going to screw people out of money at least use it to help creat more jobs in the local area! This is insane I want to stand out with a big sign and say STOP here on the white line or somebody in another state will send you a ticket! I work in Hazelwood and have been going home the same way, driving the same and stopping the same for two years and never got a ticket until this month. It is BS. I am not shopping in hazelwood ever again. when I go out to lunch I will drive outside of hazelwood. That is how mad I am about this!
Dr. Phil
11:28 am on Friday, October 7, 2011
OOH and obviously they have had a lot of comments on the right turn because on the back of the form it says if you were making a right turn you did not come to a complete (and complete is underlined) stop. This is ALL about money and has nothing to do with safety.
kevin
5:57 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011
BIG TIME MONEY GRAB!!!!!!!
Ms Murray
7:48 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011
Dr. Phil. My husband received the same ticket. We wrote to the City about the issue with the right turn off of Lindbergh south onto Dunn/Lynn Haven. We had the ticket removed without paying a fine. If you know you have to stop behind the line, then do it. Then move forward to see if it safe to proceed. Stop arguing about something that is clearly your fault. It's sad to see someone complain about something when they know they are not following the letter of the law. This is just the same as doing a slow roll as you turn right. If it doesn't have a yield sign then you obviously have to stop. Maybe everyone that gets a Red Light ticket should have to go through a 3 hour class on driving rules again to avoid paying the first ticket. Ticket one - shame on them, ticket two - shame on you.
Candace Jarrett
8:29 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011
If you ever have a question about the ticket and its validity, there is a website address on the back where you can go and view your video to see if it really occurred as such. Now if you know someone else was driving your car, that where the problem arises because you still get the ticket.